[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1500875013-123321-1-git-send-email-yehs1@lenovo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 05:43:14 +0000
From: Huaisheng HS1 Ye <yehs1@...ovo.com>
To: "srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huaisheng HS1 Ye" <yehs1@...ovo.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix cpuinfo_cur_freq after performance
governor changes
After commit 82b4e03e01bc (intel_pstate: skip scheduler hook when
in "performance" mode) Software P-state control modes couldn't get
dynamic value during performance mode, and it still in last value from
powersave mode, so clear its value to get same behavior as Hardware
P-state to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@...ovo.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 6cd5035..c675626 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2050,6 +2050,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
*/
intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
intel_pstate_max_within_limits(cpu);
+ cpu->sample.core_avg_perf = 0;
} else {
intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
}
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists