Message-ID: <20170724085718.GA6485@hc>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:57:18 +0200
From:   Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@...iumnetworks.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] perf: cavium: Support memory controller PMU
 counters

Hi Jonathan,

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:31:01PM +0800, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:08:45 +0200
> Jan Glauber <jglauber@...ium.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add support for the PMU counters on Cavium SOC memory controllers.
> > 
> > This patch also adds generic functions to allow supporting more
> > devices with PMU counters.
> > 
> > Properties of the LMC PMU counters:
> > - not stoppable
> > - fixed purpose
> > - read-only
> > - one PCI device per memory controller
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@...ium.com>
> Hi Jan,
> 
> A few little things I noticed whilst taking a quick look.
> 
> Jonathan
> > ---
> >  drivers/perf/Kconfig       |   8 +
> >  drivers/perf/Makefile      |   1 +
> >  drivers/perf/cavium_pmu.c  | 416 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/cpuhotplug.h |   1 +
> >  4 files changed, 426 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/perf/cavium_pmu.c
> <snip>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * The pmu events are independent from CPUs. Provide a cpumask
> > + * nevertheless to prevent perf from adding the event per-cpu and just
> > + * set the mask to one online CPU. Use the same cpumask for all "uncore"
> > + * devices.
> > + *
> > + * There is a performance penalty for accessing a device from a CPU on
> > + * another socket, but we do not care.
> > + */
> > +static int cvm_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int old_cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> > +{
> > +	struct cvm_pmu_dev *pmu_dev;
> > +	int new_cpu;
> > +
> > +	pmu_dev = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct cvm_pmu_dev, cpuhp_node);
> > +	if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(old_cpu, &pmu_dev->active_mask))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	new_cpu = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, old_cpu);
> > +	if (new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> > +		return 0;
> Blank line.

OK

> > +	perf_pmu_migrate_context(&pmu_dev->pmu, old_cpu, new_cpu);
> > +	cpumask_set_cpu(new_cpu, &pmu_dev->active_mask);
> nitpick : blank line here would help readability.

OK

> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t cvm_pmu_attr_show_cpumask(struct device *dev,
> > +					 struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +					 char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	struct pmu *pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +	struct cvm_pmu_dev *pmu_dev = container_of(pmu, struct cvm_pmu_dev, pmu);
> > +
> > +	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_dev->active_mask);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR(cpumask, S_IRUGO, cvm_pmu_attr_show_cpumask, NULL);
> > +
> > +static struct attribute *cvm_pmu_attrs[] = {
> > +	&dev_attr_cpumask.attr,
> > +	NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct attribute_group cvm_pmu_attr_group = {
> > +	.attrs = cvm_pmu_attrs,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * LMC (memory controller) counters:
> > + * - not stoppable, always on, read-only
> > + * - one PCI device per memory controller
> > + */
> > +#define LMC_CONFIG_OFFSET		0x188
> > +#define LMC_CONFIG_RESET_BIT		BIT(17)
> > +
> > +/* LMC events */
> > +#define LMC_EVENT_IFB_CNT		0x1d0
> > +#define LMC_EVENT_OPS_CNT		0x1d8
> > +#define LMC_EVENT_DCLK_CNT		0x1e0
> > +#define LMC_EVENT_BANK_CONFLICT1	0x360
> > +#define LMC_EVENT_BANK_CONFLICT2	0x368
> > +
> > +#define CVM_PMU_LMC_EVENT_ATTR(_name, _id)						\
> > +	&((struct perf_pmu_events_attr[]) {						\
> > +		{									\
> > +			__ATTR(_name, S_IRUGO, cvm_pmu_event_sysfs_show, NULL),		\
> > +			_id,								\
> > +			"lmc_event=" __stringify(_id),					\
> > +		}									\
> > +	})[0].attr.attr
> > +
> > +/* map counter numbers to register offsets */
> > +static int lmc_events[] = {
> > +	LMC_EVENT_IFB_CNT,
> > +	LMC_EVENT_OPS_CNT,
> > +	LMC_EVENT_DCLK_CNT,
> > +	LMC_EVENT_BANK_CONFLICT1,
> > +	LMC_EVENT_BANK_CONFLICT2,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int cvm_pmu_lmc_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> > +{
> > +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > +
> > +	return cvm_pmu_add(event, flags, LMC_CONFIG_OFFSET,
> > +			   lmc_events[hwc->config]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(lmc_event, "config:0-2");
> > +
> > +static struct attribute *cvm_pmu_lmc_format_attr[] = {
> > +	&format_attr_lmc_event.attr,
> > +	NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct attribute_group cvm_pmu_lmc_format_group = {
> > +	.name = "format",
> > +	.attrs = cvm_pmu_lmc_format_attr,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct attribute *cvm_pmu_lmc_events_attr[] = {
> > +	CVM_PMU_LMC_EVENT_ATTR(ifb_cnt,		0),
> > +	CVM_PMU_LMC_EVENT_ATTR(ops_cnt,		1),
> > +	CVM_PMU_LMC_EVENT_ATTR(dclk_cnt,	2),
> > +	CVM_PMU_LMC_EVENT_ATTR(bank_conflict1,	3),
> > +	CVM_PMU_LMC_EVENT_ATTR(bank_conflict2,	4),
> > +	NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct attribute_group cvm_pmu_lmc_events_group = {
> > +	.name = "events",
> > +	.attrs = cvm_pmu_lmc_events_attr,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct attribute_group *cvm_pmu_lmc_attr_groups[] = {
> > +	&cvm_pmu_attr_group,
> > +	&cvm_pmu_lmc_format_group,
> > +	&cvm_pmu_lmc_events_group,
> > +	NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static bool cvm_pmu_lmc_event_valid(u64 config)
> > +{
> > +	return (config < ARRAY_SIZE(lmc_events));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cvm_pmu_lmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct cvm_pmu_dev *next, *lmc;
> > +	int nr = 0, ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	lmc = kzalloc(sizeof(*lmc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!lmc)
> > +		goto fail_nomem;
> cleaner to do a direct return here as nothing to unwind.
> return -ENOMEM;

OK.

> > +
> > +	lmc->map = ioremap(pci_resource_start(pdev, 0),
> > +			   pci_resource_len(pdev, 0));
> Might be overly paranoid, but ioremap can return NULL,
> so should really be checked.
> 

I'll add the check.

> > +	list_for_each_entry(next, &cvm_pmu_lmcs, entry)
> > +		nr++;
> > +	lmc->pmu_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "lmc%d", nr);
> Check for error on the allocation.

OK, missed that.

> > +
> > +	lmc->pdev = pdev;
> > +	lmc->num_counters = ARRAY_SIZE(lmc_events);
> > +	lmc->pmu = (struct pmu) {
> > +		.task_ctx_nr    = perf_invalid_context,
> > +		.event_init	= cvm_pmu_event_init,
> > +		.add		= cvm_pmu_lmc_add,
> > +		.del		= cvm_pmu_del,
> > +		.start		= cvm_pmu_start,
> > +		.stop		= cvm_pmu_stop,
> > +		.read		= cvm_pmu_read,
> > +		.attr_groups	= cvm_pmu_lmc_attr_groups,
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_CVM_ONLINE,
> > +					 &lmc->cpuhp_node);
> This function can fail by the look of it.  Should be checking it's
> return value really.
> 

I'm ignoring the return value on purpose as I don't want probe() to fail
even if this would return an error.

> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * perf PMU is CPU dependent so pick a random CPU and migrate away
> > +	 * if it goes offline.
> > +	 */
> > +	cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &lmc->active_mask);
> > +
> > +	ret = perf_pmu_register(&lmc->pmu, lmc->pmu_name, -1);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto fail_hp;
> > +
> > +	list_add(&lmc->entry, &cvm_pmu_lmcs);
> > +
> > +	lmc->event_valid = cvm_pmu_lmc_event_valid;
> These last two elements rather look like they might cause a
> potential race as the perf_pmu_register has made the counters
> available.

Yes, they should happen before perf_pmu_register.

> > +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Enabled %s PMU with %d counters\n",
> > +		 lmc->pmu_name, lmc->num_counters);
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +fail_hp:
> > +	kfree(lmc->pmu_name);
> Convention is to unwind in the opposite order to the way things
> were created / set up.  Becomes more relevant once you are
> checking more error codes.

Agreed.

> > +	cpuhp_state_remove_instance(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_CVM_ONLINE,
> > +				    &lmc->cpuhp_node);
> > +	iounmap(lmc->map);
> > +	kfree(lmc);
> > +fail_nomem:
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init cvm_pmu_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor();
> > +	unsigned int vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_CAVIUM;
> > +	struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
> > +	int rc;
> > +
> > +	if (implementor != ARM_CPU_IMP_CAVIUM)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cvm_pmu_lmcs);
> > +
> > +	rc = cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_CVM_ONLINE,
> > +				     "perf/arm/cvm:online", NULL,
> > +				     cvm_pmu_offline_cpu);
> > +
> > +	/* detect LMC devices */
> > +	while ((pdev = pci_get_device(vendor_id, 0xa022, pdev))) {
> > +		if (!pdev)
> > +			break;
> > +		rc = cvm_pmu_lmc_probe(pdev);
> > +		if (rc)
> > +			return rc;
> > +	}
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> A comment perhaps explaining why this is a late_initcall?  What
> dependency are we forcing to be true?

PCI probing should be finished before, I'll add a comment.

thanks for the review,
Jan

> > +late_initcall(cvm_pmu_init);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> > index b56573b..78ac3d2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> > @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
> >  	CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_QCOM_L3_ONLINE,
> >  	CPUHP_AP_WORKQUEUE_ONLINE,
> >  	CPUHP_AP_RCUTREE_ONLINE,
> > +	CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_CVM_ONLINE,
> >  	CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
> >  	CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN_END		= CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN + 30,
> >  	CPUHP_AP_X86_HPET_ONLINE,
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists