lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170724135946.srzjfrjfnv6oldjc@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:59:47 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     shuwang@...hat.com
Cc:     corbet@....net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kmemleak: add oom=<disable|ignore> runtime parameter

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 05:16:34PM +0800, shuwang@...hat.com wrote:
> When running memory stress tests, kmemleak could be easily disabled in
> function create_object as system is out of memory and kmemleak failed to
> alloc from object_cache. Since there's no way to enable kmemleak after
> it's off, simply ignore the object_cache alloc failure will just loses
> track of some memory objects, but could increase the usability of kmemleak
> under memory stress.

I wonder how usable kmemleak is when not recording all the allocated
objects. If some of these memory blocks contain references to others,
such referenced objects could be reported as leaks (basically increasing
the false positives rate).

-- 
Catalin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ