[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1707241039210.1739-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:41:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@...hat.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
<linux@...ck-us.net>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: USB disk speed regression WD Elements - with bisect result
22547c4cc4fe20698a6a85a55b8788859134b8e4
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've problem with my USB storage devices: WD Elements 1TB.
> (Bus 004 Device 002: ID 1058:10a8 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Elements
> Portable (WDBUZG))
>
>
> After kernel >4.9 when disk is attached via cable it has very low speed
> (less then 1MB/s).
>
> It can run at full speed (>22MB/s) when the Linux kernel is fully rebooted (so
> disk is attached during the reboot of Lenovo T61, C2D, Fedora Rawhide).
>
> However when >4.9 kernel is running and disk is just attached it's very slow.
>
> I've played a bisect game - and the clean result has been:
>
> 22547c4cc4fe20698a6a85a55b8788859134b8e4
>
> When I just revert this patch with 4.13-rc1 - it's again running with full
> speed even when disk is attached (thus no reboot is needed for full speed).
>
>
> So while I've no idea what 22547c4cc4fe20698... is doing, it seems to have
> some unpleasant side-effect on regular USB devices.
>
> So what else is needed to get this properly working ?
> (assuming plain revert of 22547c4cc4fe20698 is unwanted).
>
> What more info can I provide to get this storage 'normally' usable without
> rebooting the machine.
Please post the dmesg logs showing what happens when the disk is
first attached and operates slowly, and what happens when the disk is
attached following a reboot and operates normally.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists