[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170724230418.000078b1@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 23:04:18 +0800
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
<lars@...afoo.de>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
<knaack.h@....de>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<benjamin.gaignard@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: stm32: add optional
min-sample-time
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:55:37 +0200
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com> wrote:
> On 07/23/2017 12:53 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:35:31 +0200
> > Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com> wrote:
> >
> >> STM32 ADC allows each channel to be sampled with a different sampling
> >> time. There's an application note that deals with this: 'How to get
> >> the best ADC accuracy in STM32...' It basically depends on analog input
> >> signal electrical properties (depends on board).
> >>
> >> Add optional 'min-sample-time' property so this can be tuned in dt.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
> >
> > This isn't yet very standard, so I think it needs a manufacturer
> > prefix, e.g. st,min-sample-time. Also convention is I believe
> > to include the units as part of the naming where appropriate.
> >
> > Hence st,min-sample-time-nsecs
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I originally used st,... form, when writing this patch, until I found
> out there's 'min-sample-time' in vf610 adc dt-bindings:
> - Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/vf610-adc.txt
> It looks like to me very similar.
>
> I also agree it misses '-nsecs' units. Sure, I can use your suggestion
> above...
>
> Please can you just confirm if I should use same property as vf610 adc,
> or 'st,min-sample-time-nsecs' ?
st,min-sample-time-nsecs.
We might well add a generic option in future, but the burden of
supporting this old one will be trivial anyway so not a problem.
Jonathan
>
> Thanks for reviewing,
> Best regards,
> Fabrice
>
> >
> > Otherwise, seems good to me.
> >
> > Jonathan
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/st,stm32-adc.txt | 5 +++++
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/st,stm32-adc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/st,stm32-adc.txt
> >> index 8310073..9cd964b 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/st,stm32-adc.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/st,stm32-adc.txt
> >> @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ Optional properties:
> >> * can be 6, 8, 10 or 12 on stm32f4
> >> * can be 8, 10, 12, 14 or 16 on stm32h7
> >> Default is maximum resolution if unset.
> >> +- min-sample-time: Minimum sampling time in nanoseconds.
> >> + Depending on hardware (board) e.g. high/low analog input source impedance,
> >> + fine tune of ADC sampling time may be recommended.
> >> + This can be either one value or an array that matches 'st,adc-channels' list,
> >> + to set sample time resp. for all channels, or independently for each channel.
> >>
> >> Example:
> >> adc: adc@...12000 {
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists