[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170724155413.GB17917@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:54:13 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
sparmaintainer@...sys.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] vmbus: Switch to use new generic UUID API
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:28:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> There are new types and helpers that are supposed to be used in new code.
>
> As a preparation to get rid of legacy types and API functions do
> the conversion here.
Can you split the uapi changes into a separate patch?
I'd love to kill the guid_le userspace exposure, but I'd also like to
see how current userspace uses them. Obviously your change is not
a break in the ABI, but it is a break in the API. I would prefer if
we could not expose it, but I'd like to hear feedback from the consumers
of these UAPI headers - the fields aren't used in kernel space at all,
but userspace might be using it, and we'll need to look into alternatives
for it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists