lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:54:13 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
        sparmaintainer@...sys.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] vmbus: Switch to use new generic UUID API

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:28:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> There are new types and helpers that are supposed to be used in new code.
> 
> As a preparation to get rid of legacy types and API functions do
> the conversion here.

Can you split the uapi changes into a separate patch?

I'd love to kill the guid_le userspace exposure, but I'd also like to
see how current userspace uses them.  Obviously your change is not
a break in the ABI, but it is a break in the API.  I would prefer if
we could not expose it, but I'd like to hear feedback from the consumers
of these UAPI headers - the fields aren't used in kernel space at all,
but userspace might be using it, and we'll need to look into alternatives
for it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ