[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1500917682.2042.62.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:44:03 +0000
From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
To: "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mchehab@...pensource.com" <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac
On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 18:37 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:56:27PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > Yes, Mauro has already pointed this out. As I replied to him, we
> > do have a separate series of platforms that do not have built-in
> > RAS, and
>
> So this whitelist entry
>
> +static struct acpi_oemlist oemlist[] = {
> + {"HPE ", "Server ", 0, ACPI_SIG_FADT, all_versions},
> + { } /* End */
> +};
>
> looks like it'll match every HP server platform not only the ones
> with built-in RAS.
I assumed our platforms w/o build-in RAS do not implement GHES, but I
will check for sure. Also, all our previous/current platforms have
"HP".
Thanks,
-Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists