linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Add TPS() protection for _rcu_barrier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1500932684-10469-10-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:44:39 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Add TPS() protection for _rcu_barrier_trace strings

The _rcu_barrier_trace() function is a wrapper for trace_rcu_barrier(),
which needs TPS() protection for strings passed through the second
argument.  However, it has escaped prior TPS()-ification efforts because
it _rcu_barrier_trace() does not start with "trace_".  This commit
therefore adds the needed TPS() protection

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 9a90d9b1dc04..7e018696fd82 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3553,10 +3553,11 @@ static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 	struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
 
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count)) {
-		_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "LastCB", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
+		_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("LastCB"), -1,
+				   rsp->barrier_sequence);
 		complete(&rsp->barrier_completion);
 	} else {
-		_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "CB", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
+		_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("CB"), -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -3568,14 +3569,15 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
 	struct rcu_state *rsp = type;
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
 
-	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "IRQ", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
+	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("IRQ"), -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
 	rdp->barrier_head.func = rcu_barrier_callback;
 	debug_rcu_head_queue(&rdp->barrier_head);
 	if (rcu_segcblist_entrain(&rdp->cblist, &rdp->barrier_head, 0)) {
 		atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count);
 	} else {
 		debug_rcu_head_unqueue(&rdp->barrier_head);
-		_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "IRQNQ", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
+		_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("IRQNQ"), -1,
+				   rsp->barrier_sequence);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -3589,14 +3591,15 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	struct rcu_data *rdp;
 	unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&rsp->barrier_sequence);
 
-	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Begin", -1, s);
+	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("Begin"), -1, s);
 
 	/* Take mutex to serialize concurrent rcu_barrier() requests. */
 	mutex_lock(&rsp->barrier_mutex);
 
 	/* Did someone else do our work for us? */
 	if (rcu_seq_done(&rsp->barrier_sequence, s)) {
-		_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "EarlyExit", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
+		_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("EarlyExit"), -1,
+				   rsp->barrier_sequence);
 		smp_mb(); /* caller's subsequent code after above check. */
 		mutex_unlock(&rsp->barrier_mutex);
 		return;
@@ -3604,7 +3607,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 
 	/* Mark the start of the barrier operation. */
 	rcu_seq_start(&rsp->barrier_sequence);
-	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc1", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
+	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("Inc1"), -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
 
 	/*
 	 * Initialize the count to one rather than to zero in order to
@@ -3627,10 +3630,10 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 		rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
 		if (rcu_is_nocb_cpu(cpu)) {
 			if (!rcu_nocb_cpu_needs_barrier(rsp, cpu)) {
-				_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OfflineNoCB", cpu,
+				_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("OfflineNoCB"), cpu,
 						   rsp->barrier_sequence);
 			} else {
-				_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineNoCB", cpu,
+				_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("OnlineNoCB"), cpu,
 						   rsp->barrier_sequence);
 				smp_mb__before_atomic();
 				atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count);
@@ -3638,11 +3641,11 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 					   rcu_barrier_callback, rsp, cpu, 0);
 			}
 		} else if (rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist)) {
-			_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineQ", cpu,
+			_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("OnlineQ"), cpu,
 					   rsp->barrier_sequence);
 			smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func, rsp, 1);
 		} else {
-			_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineNQ", cpu,
+			_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("OnlineNQ"), cpu,
 					   rsp->barrier_sequence);
 		}
 	}
@@ -3659,7 +3662,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	wait_for_completion(&rsp->barrier_completion);
 
 	/* Mark the end of the barrier operation. */
-	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc2", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
+	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, TPS("Inc2"), -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
 	rcu_seq_end(&rsp->barrier_sequence);
 
 	/* Other rcu_barrier() invocations can now safely proceed. */
-- 
2.5.2