| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/13] xen/pvcalls: implement bind command
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 22/07/17 02:11, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Send PVCALLS_BIND to the backend. Introduce a new structure, part of
> > struct sock_mapping, to store information specific to passive sockets.
> >
> > Introduce a status field to keep track of the status of the passive
> > socket.
> >
> > Introduce a waitqueue for the "accept" command (see the accept command
> > implementation): it is used to allow only one outstanding accept
> > command at any given time and to implement polling on the passive
> > socket. Introduce a flags field to keep track of in-flight accept and
> > poll commands.
> >
> > sock->sk->sk_send_head is not used for ip sockets: reuse the field to
> > store a pointer to the struct sock_mapping corresponding to the socket.
> >
> > Convert the struct socket pointer into an uint64_t and use it as id for
> > the socket to pass to the backend.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
> > CC: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
> > CC: jgross@...e.com
> > ---
> > drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h | 3 ++
> > 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> > index 0d305e0..71619bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> > @@ -57,6 +57,23 @@ struct sock_mapping {
> >
> > wait_queue_head_t inflight_conn_req;
> > } active;
> > + struct {
> > + /* Socket status */
> > +#define PVCALLS_STATUS_UNINITALIZED 0
> > +#define PVCALLS_STATUS_BIND 1
> > +#define PVCALLS_STATUS_LISTEN 2
> > + uint8_t status;
> > + /*
> > + * Internal state-machine flags.
> > + * Only one accept operation can be inflight for a socket.
> > + * Only one poll operation can be inflight for a given socket.
> > + */
> > +#define PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT 0
> > +#define PVCALLS_FLAG_POLL_INFLIGHT 1
> > +#define PVCALLS_FLAG_POLL_RET 2
> > + uint8_t flags;
> > + wait_queue_head_t inflight_accept_req;
> > + } passive;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > @@ -287,6 +304,63 @@ int pvcalls_front_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +int pvcalls_front_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
> > +{
> > + struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata;
> > + struct sock_mapping *map = NULL;
> > + struct xen_pvcalls_request *req;
> > + int notify, req_id, ret;
> > +
> > + if (!pvcalls_front_dev)
> > + return -ENOTCONN;
> > + if (addr->sa_family != AF_INET || sock->type != SOCK_STREAM)
> > + return -ENOTSUPP;
> > + bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&pvcalls_front_dev->dev);
> > +
> > + map = kzalloc(sizeof(*map), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (map == NULL)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> > + req_id = bedata->ring.req_prod_pvt & (RING_SIZE(&bedata->ring) - 1);
> > + BUG_ON(req_id >= PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING);
>
> BUG_ON() isn't appropriate here. The system can still be used.
Yes, and checkpatch.pl also told me the same. Basically, this condition
cannot happen, I'll just remove the BUG_ON.
> > + if (RING_FULL(&bedata->ring) ||
> > + READ_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id) != PVCALLS_INVALID_ID) {
> > + kfree(map);
> > + spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> > + return -EAGAIN;
> > + }
> > + req = RING_GET_REQUEST(&bedata->ring, req_id);
> > + req->req_id = req_id;
> > + map->sock = sock;
> > + req->cmd = PVCALLS_BIND;
> > + req->u.bind.id = (uint64_t) sock;
> > + memcpy(req->u.bind.addr, addr, sizeof(*addr));
> > + req->u.bind.len = addr_len;
> > +
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&map->passive.inflight_accept_req);
> > +
> > + list_add_tail(&map->list, &bedata->socketpass_mappings);
> > + WRITE_ONCE(sock->sk->sk_send_head, (void *)map);
> > + map->active_socket = false;
> > +
> > + bedata->ring.req_prod_pvt++;
> > + RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&bedata->ring, notify);
> > + spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> > + if (notify)
> > + notify_remote_via_irq(bedata->irq);
> > +
> > + wait_event(bedata->inflight_req,
> > + READ_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id) == req_id);
> > +
> > + map->passive.status = PVCALLS_STATUS_BIND;
> > + ret = bedata->rsp[req_id].ret;
> > + /* read ret, then set this rsp slot to be reused */
> > + smp_mb();
> > + WRITE_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id, PVCALLS_INVALID_ID);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct xenbus_device_id pvcalls_front_ids[] = {
> > { "pvcalls" },
> > { "" }
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> > index 63b0417..8b0a274 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> > @@ -6,5 +6,8 @@
> > int pvcalls_front_socket(struct socket *sock);
> > int pvcalls_front_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
> > int addr_len, int flags);
> > +int pvcalls_front_bind(struct socket *sock,
> > + struct sockaddr *addr,
> > + int addr_len);
> >
> > #endif
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists