linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 062/125] ext2: Dont clear SGID when inheriting ACLs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:19:37 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 062/125] ext2: Dont clear SGID when inheriting ACLs

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit a992f2d38e4ce17b8c7d1f7f67b2de0eebdea069 upstream.

When new directory 'DIR1' is created in a directory 'DIR0' with SGID bit
set, DIR1 is expected to have SGID bit set (and owning group equal to
the owning group of 'DIR0'). However when 'DIR0' also has some default
ACLs that 'DIR1' inherits, setting these ACLs will result in SGID bit on
'DIR1' to get cleared if user is not member of the owning group.

Fix the problem by creating __ext2_set_acl() function that does not call
posix_acl_update_mode() and use it when inheriting ACLs. That prevents
SGID bit clearing and the mode has been properly set by
posix_acl_create() anyway.

Fixes: 073931017b49d9458aa351605b43a7e34598caef
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext2/acl.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext2/acl.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/acl.c
@@ -175,11 +175,8 @@ ext2_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int ty
 	return acl;
 }
 
-/*
- * inode->i_mutex: down
- */
-int
-ext2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
+static int
+__ext2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
 {
 	int name_index;
 	void *value = NULL;
@@ -189,13 +186,6 @@ ext2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct
 	switch(type) {
 		case ACL_TYPE_ACCESS:
 			name_index = EXT2_XATTR_INDEX_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS;
-			if (acl) {
-				error = posix_acl_update_mode(inode, &inode->i_mode, &acl);
-				if (error)
-					return error;
-				inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
-				mark_inode_dirty(inode);
-			}
 			break;
 
 		case ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT:
@@ -222,6 +212,24 @@ ext2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct
 }
 
 /*
+ * inode->i_mutex: down
+ */
+int
+ext2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
+{
+	int error;
+
+	if (type == ACL_TYPE_ACCESS && acl) {
+		error = posix_acl_update_mode(inode, &inode->i_mode, &acl);
+		if (error)
+			return error;
+		inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
+		mark_inode_dirty(inode);
+	}
+	return __ext2_set_acl(inode, acl, type);
+}
+
+/*
  * Initialize the ACLs of a new inode. Called from ext2_new_inode.
  *
  * dir->i_mutex: down
@@ -238,12 +246,12 @@ ext2_init_acl(struct inode *inode, struc
 		return error;
 
 	if (default_acl) {
-		error = ext2_set_acl(inode, default_acl, ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT);
+		error = __ext2_set_acl(inode, default_acl, ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT);
 		posix_acl_release(default_acl);
 	}
 	if (acl) {
 		if (!error)
-			error = ext2_set_acl(inode, acl, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS);
+			error = __ext2_set_acl(inode, acl, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS);
 		posix_acl_release(acl);
 	}
 	return error;