linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 83/83] alarmtimer: dont rate limit one-shot timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170725191721.306211492@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:19:47 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Fennema <fennema@...gle.com>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 83/83] alarmtimer: dont rate limit one-shot timers

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>

Commit ff86bf0c65f1 ("alarmtimer: Rate limit periodic intervals") sets a
minimum bound on the alarm timer interval.  This minimum bound shouldn't
be applied if the interval is 0.  Otherwise, one-shot timers will be
converted into periodic ones.

Fixes: ff86bf0c65f1 ("alarmtimer: Rate limit periodic intervals")
Reported-by: Ben Fennema <fennema@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/time/alarmtimer.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
@@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ static int alarm_timer_set(struct k_itim
 	 * Rate limit to the tick as a hot fix to prevent DOS. Will be
 	 * mopped up later.
 	 */
-	if (ktime_to_ns(timr->it.alarm.interval) < TICK_NSEC)
+	if (timr->it.alarm.interval.tv64 &&
+			ktime_to_ns(timr->it.alarm.interval) < TICK_NSEC)
 		timr->it.alarm.interval = ktime_set(0, TICK_NSEC);
 
 	exp = timespec_to_ktime(new_setting->it_value);