[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170725091012.3hpxihekht2j35xb@dell>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:10:12 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: "Mani, Rajmohan" <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com" <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Rajmohan Mani wrote:
> >
> > > The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that powers
> > a
> > > Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for image sensors,
> > > drives a dual LED for Flash and incorporates two LED drivers for
> > > general purpose indicators.
> > >
> > > This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 +++++++
> > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/mfd/tps68470.c | 110
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h | 97
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c create mode 100644
> > > include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
[...]
> > > +static const struct regmap_config tps68470_regmap_config = {
> > > + .reg_bits = 8,
> > > + .val_bits = 8,
> > > + .max_register = TPS68470_REG_MAX,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int tps68470_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap
> > > +*regmap) {
> > > + unsigned int version;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + /* Force software reset */
> > > + ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET,
> > TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> >
> > Will 'if (!ret)' do?
> >
>
> We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.
Yes, 'if (!ret)' does that too.
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = regmap_read(regmap, TPS68470_REG_REVID, &version);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> >
> > Same
> >
>
> We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.
As above.
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to read revision register: %d\n", ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + dev_info(dev, "TPS68470 REVID: 0x%x\n", version);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int tps68470_probe(struct i2c_client *client) {
> > > + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > > + struct regmap *regmap;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps68470_regmap_config);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "devm_regmap_init_i2c Error %ld\n",
> > > + PTR_ERR(regmap));
> > > + return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
> > > +
> > > + ret = tps68470_chip_init(dev, regmap);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> >
> > Same
> >
>
> We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.
As above.
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists