[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3k3wRzcGSaSdEJ-YZshrREygZ+i9HKn56QYN+mHDBgTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:35:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] gpu: ipu-v3: add DRM dependency
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 09:33 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 22:56 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> If you only need build-testing, you could have a simple wrapper like
>>
>> const struct drm_format_info *ipu_format_info(u32 format)
>> {
>> static const struct drm_format_info invalid = {};
>>
>> if (!IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_DRM))
>> return &invalid;
>>
>> return drm_format_info(format);
>> }
>
> That should work fine. Both ipu_prg_format_supported and
> ipu_prg_channel_configure are only ever called by DRM code.
Ok, in that case, I think we should just make the compilation
of PRE and PRG conditional and leave them out when DRM
is not built-in (be aware of the case of DRM=m, IPU=y).
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists