linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170725002348.GD24530@x1>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:23:48 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        hpa@...or.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
        thgarnie@...gle.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be
 randomized in mirror regions

On 07/24/17 at 02:34pm, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul, at 09:19:56PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> >
> > There are places where the efi map is getting and used like this. E.g
> > in efi_high_alloc() of drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c.
> > EFI developers worry the size of efi_memory_desc_t could not be the same
> > as e->efi_memdesc_size?
> > 
> > Hi Matt,
> > 
> > Could you help have a look at this?
> 
> You're exactly right. The code guards against the size of the
> efi_memory_desc_t struct changing. The UEFI spec says to traverse the
> memory map this way.

Thanks a lot, Matt. Then I will keep using the way.