[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170725192054.855369381@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:22:59 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.12 180/196] percpu_counter: Rename __percpu_counter_add to percpu_counter_add_batch
4.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
commit 104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a upstream.
Currently, percpu_counter_add is a wrapper around __percpu_counter_add
which is preempt safe due to explicit calls to preempt_disable. Given
how __ prefix is used in percpu related interfaces, the naming
unfortunately creates the false sense that __percpu_counter_add is
less safe than percpu_counter_add. In terms of context-safety,
they're equivalent. The only difference is that the __ version takes
a batch parameter.
Make this a bit more explicit by just renaming __percpu_counter_add to
percpu_counter_add_batch.
This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.
tj: Minor updates to patch description for clarity. Cosmetic
indentation updates.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 12 ++++++------
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 6 +++---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 8 ++++----
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/backing-dev.h | 2 +-
include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 6 +++---
include/linux/mman.h | 2 +-
include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 7 ++++---
include/net/inet_frag.h | 4 ++--
lib/flex_proportions.c | 6 +++---
lib/percpu_counter.c | 4 ++--
11 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -1255,9 +1255,9 @@ void clean_tree_block(struct btrfs_fs_in
btrfs_assert_tree_locked(buf);
if (test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &buf->bflags)) {
- __percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- -buf->len,
- fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ -buf->len,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
/* ugh, clear_extent_buffer_dirty needs to lock the page */
btrfs_set_lock_blocking(buf);
clear_extent_buffer_dirty(buf);
@@ -4049,9 +4049,9 @@ void btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(struct exte
buf->start, transid, fs_info->generation);
was_dirty = set_extent_buffer_dirty(buf);
if (!was_dirty)
- __percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- buf->len,
- fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ buf->len,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY
if (btrfs_header_level(buf) == 0 && check_leaf(root, buf)) {
btrfs_print_leaf(fs_info, buf);
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3597,9 +3597,9 @@ lock_extent_buffer_for_io(struct extent_
set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK, &eb->bflags);
spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
btrfs_set_header_flag(eb, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN);
- __percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- -eb->len,
- fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ -eb->len,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
ret = 1;
} else {
spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -1766,8 +1766,8 @@ static void btrfs_set_bit_hook(struct in
if (btrfs_is_testing(fs_info))
return;
- __percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes, len,
- fs_info->delalloc_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes, len,
+ fs_info->delalloc_batch);
spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
BTRFS_I(inode)->delalloc_bytes += len;
if (*bits & EXTENT_DEFRAG)
@@ -1840,8 +1840,8 @@ static void btrfs_clear_bit_hook(struct
&inode->vfs_inode,
state->start, len);
- __percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes, -len,
- fs_info->delalloc_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes, -len,
+ fs_info->delalloc_batch);
spin_lock(&inode->lock);
inode->delalloc_bytes -= len;
if (do_list && inode->delalloc_bytes == 0 &&
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ xfs_mod_icount(
struct xfs_mount *mp,
int64_t delta)
{
- __percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, delta, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_icount, delta, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH);
if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_icount, 0, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH) < 0) {
ASSERT(0);
percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, -delta);
@@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ xfs_mod_fdblocks(
else
batch = XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH;
- __percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_fdblocks, delta, batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_fdblocks, delta, batch);
if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, mp->m_alloc_set_aside,
XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH) >= 0) {
/* we had space! */
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline bool bdi_has_dirty_io(stru
static inline void __add_wb_stat(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
enum wb_stat_item item, s64 amount)
{
- __percpu_counter_add(&wb->stat[item], amount, WB_STAT_BATCH);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&wb->stat[item], amount, WB_STAT_BATCH);
}
static inline void __inc_wb_stat(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
--- a/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static inline void blkg_stat_exit(struct
*/
static inline void blkg_stat_add(struct blkg_stat *stat, uint64_t val)
{
- __percpu_counter_add(&stat->cpu_cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&stat->cpu_cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
}
/**
@@ -597,14 +597,14 @@ static inline void blkg_rwstat_add(struc
else
cnt = &rwstat->cpu_cnt[BLKG_RWSTAT_READ];
- __percpu_counter_add(cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
if (op_is_sync(op))
cnt = &rwstat->cpu_cnt[BLKG_RWSTAT_SYNC];
else
cnt = &rwstat->cpu_cnt[BLKG_RWSTAT_ASYNC];
- __percpu_counter_add(cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
}
/**
--- a/include/linux/mman.h
+++ b/include/linux/mman.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ unsigned long vm_memory_committed(void);
static inline void vm_acct_memory(long pages)
{
- __percpu_counter_add(&vm_committed_as, pages, vm_committed_as_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&vm_committed_as, pages, vm_committed_as_batch);
}
static inline void vm_unacct_memory(long pages)
--- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ int __percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_
void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
-void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch);
+void percpu_counter_add_batch(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount,
+ s32 batch);
s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
int __percpu_counter_compare(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 rhs, s32 batch);
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ static inline int percpu_counter_compare
static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
{
- __percpu_counter_add(fbc, amount, percpu_counter_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(fbc, amount, percpu_counter_batch);
}
static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
@@ -136,7 +137,7 @@ percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter
}
static inline void
-__percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
+percpu_counter_add_batch(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
{
percpu_counter_add(fbc, amount);
}
--- a/include/net/inet_frag.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_frag.h
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static inline int frag_mem_limit(struct
static inline void sub_frag_mem_limit(struct netns_frags *nf, int i)
{
- __percpu_counter_add(&nf->mem, -i, frag_percpu_counter_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&nf->mem, -i, frag_percpu_counter_batch);
}
static inline void add_frag_mem_limit(struct netns_frags *nf, int i)
{
- __percpu_counter_add(&nf->mem, i, frag_percpu_counter_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&nf->mem, i, frag_percpu_counter_batch);
}
static inline unsigned int sum_frag_mem_limit(struct netns_frags *nf)
--- a/lib/flex_proportions.c
+++ b/lib/flex_proportions.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static void fprop_reflect_period_percpu(
if (val < (nr_cpu_ids * PROP_BATCH))
val = percpu_counter_sum(&pl->events);
- __percpu_counter_add(&pl->events,
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events,
-val + (val >> (period-pl->period)), PROP_BATCH);
} else
percpu_counter_set(&pl->events, 0);
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void fprop_reflect_period_percpu(
void __fprop_inc_percpu(struct fprop_global *p, struct fprop_local_percpu *pl)
{
fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl);
- __percpu_counter_add(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1);
}
@@ -267,6 +267,6 @@ void __fprop_inc_percpu_max(struct fprop
return;
} else
fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl);
- __percpu_counter_add(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1);
}
--- a/lib/percpu_counter.c
+++ b/lib/percpu_counter.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_co
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_set);
-void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
+void percpu_counter_add_batch(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
{
s64 count;
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_
}
preempt_enable();
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_add);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_add_batch);
/*
* Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result. This is a more accurate
Powered by blists - more mailing lists