[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d59b609-aeec-9177-8849-da1fbd386191@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:04:23 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: create a Kconfig menu for irqchip drivers
On 26/07/17 05:03, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Some irqchip drivers have a Kconfig prompt. When we run menuconfig
> or friends, those drivers are directly listed in the "Device Drivers"
> menu level. This does not look nice. Create a sub-system level menu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index f1fd5f44d1d4..7b66313a2952 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +menu "IRQ chip support"
> +
> config IRQCHIP
> def_bool y
> depends on OF_IRQ
> @@ -306,3 +308,5 @@ config QCOM_IRQ_COMBINER
> help
> Say yes here to add support for the IRQ combiner devices embedded
> in Qualcomm Technologies chips.
> +
> +endmenu
>
I'm very reluctant to introduce this. IMHO, interrupt controllers are
way too low level a thing to let them be selected by the user. They
really should be selected by the platform that needs them
Do you have any example in mind where having a user-selectable interrupt
controller actually makes sense on its own?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists