linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170726085038.GB2981@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:50:38 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, steve.capper@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and
 document behaviour

On Tue 25-07-17 16:41:14, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> When walking the page tables to resolve an address that points to
> !p*d_present() entry, huge_pte_offset() returns inconsistent values
> depending on the level of page table (PUD or PMD).
> 
> It returns NULL in the case of a PUD entry while in the case of a PMD
> entry, it returns a pointer to the page table entry.
> 
> A similar inconsitency exists when handling swap entries - returns NULL
> for a PUD entry while a pointer to the pte_t is retured for the PMD
> entry.
> 
> Update huge_pte_offset() to make the behaviour consistent - return NULL
> in the case of p*d_none() and a pointer to the pte_t for hugepage or
> swap entries.
> 
> Document the behaviour to clarify the expected behaviour of this
> function. This is to set clear semantics for architecture specific
> implementations of huge_pte_offset().

hugetlb pte semantic is a disaster and I agree it could see some
cleanup/clarifications but I am quite nervous to see a patchi like this.
How do we check that nothing will get silently broken by this change?

> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index bc48ee783dd9..72dd1139a8e4 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4603,6 +4603,13 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  	return pte;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * huge_pte_offset() - Walk the page table to resolve the hugepage
> + * entry at address @addr
> + *
> + * Return: Pointer to page table or swap entry (PUD or PMD) for address @addr
> + * or NULL if the entry is p*d_none().
> + */
>  pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  		       unsigned long addr, unsigned long sz)
>  {
> @@ -4617,13 +4624,22 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  	p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, addr);
>  	if (!p4d_present(*p4d))
>  		return NULL;
> +
>  	pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
> -	if (!pud_present(*pud))
> +	if (pud_none(*pud))
>  		return NULL;
> -	if (pud_huge(*pud))
> +	/* hugepage or swap? */
> +	if (pud_huge(*pud) || !pud_present(*pud))
>  		return (pte_t *)pud;
> +
>  	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> -	return (pte_t *) pmd;
> +	if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> +		return NULL;
> +	/* hugepage or swap? */
> +	if (pmd_huge(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd))
> +		return (pte_t *) pmd;
> +
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB */
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs