[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170726104707.a7gm5vfoomvhzv3w@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:47:07 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Xinliang Liu <z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com>,
Rongrong Zou <zourongrong@...il.com>,
Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.co.uk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/hisilicon: fix build error without fbdev emulation
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 08:58:16AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >> We cannot reference priv->fbdev outside of the #ifdef:
> >>
> >> drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1881:12: error: 'virtnet_restore_up' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> >> static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >> drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1859:13: error: 'virtnet_freeze_down' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> >> static void virtnet_freeze_down(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >>
> >> As the #ifdef is a bit annoying here, this removes it entirely
> >> and uses an IS_ENABLED() check in it place where needed.
> >>
> >> Fixes: b4dd9f1ffaba ("drm/hisilicon: Remove custom FB helper deferred setup")
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > I guess I wasn't clear enough, but you don't even need the IS_ENABLED.
> > The cma_fini/init functions themselves don't get no-opped out (I guess
> > we could fix that), but the underlying fb helper functions they call
> > do, so this is all perfectly fine to call unconditionally. And that's
> > what all other drivers do. Should I edit while applying, or do you
> > want to respin?
>
> Please just edit as you like then, I think that's quicker.
>
> The version I sent was meant to have smaller object code as well, and
> I didn't think we could rely on drm_fb_cma_helper.c being built without
> CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION, but I see now that they are
> independent as you say, so making them unconditional indeed gives
> the simplest code.
Done, thanks.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists