linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] remoteproc: dt: Provide bindings for iMX6SX/7D Remote Processor Controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:11:55 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>
Cc:     Oleksij Rempel <ore@...gutronix.de>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] remoteproc: dt: Provide bindings for iMX6SX/7D
 Remote Processor Controller driver

On Sun 23 Jul 22:56 PDT 2017, Oleksij Rempel wrote:

> Am 18.07.2017 um 18:38 schrieb Bjorn Andersson:
> > On Tue 18 Jul 01:45 PDT 2017, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> >> On 11.07.2017 00:14, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
[..]
> >>> Also, as you warn about the user needing to pick the values for "ddr",
> >>> does that mean that it's a carveout of System RAM?
> >>
> >> Yes, it is a part of System RAM.
> >>
> > 
> > Then there will be an associated reserved-memory region for the
> > region(s), you should add a label to this and use "memory-region" to get
> > hold of the addresses instead.
> 
> Ok. Should only system memory region be assigned over reserved-memory or
> all of named regions?
> 

You can do it either way, but unless you see a strong reason against it
I would recommend just having a single region, for simplicity.

Regards,
Bjorn