[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170726171423.GQ12049@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:14:23 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
Cc: corbet@....net, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/10] net: dsa: lan9303: added sysfs node
swe_bcst_throt
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
> Allowing per-port access to Switch Engine Broadcast Throttling Register
Hi Egil
In general, we are against using sysfs. If there is a generic
mechanism, that applies for all sorts of network interfaces, it should
be used instead of sysfs.
Is this intended to reduce the effect of broadcast storms?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists