linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net: dsa: lan9303: Fixed MDIO interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170726213943.GA7966@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:39:43 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, corbet@....net,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net: dsa: lan9303: Fixed MDIO interface

> Good. Just one question about process. Could I have posted my work
> as a RFC? To get one round of initial feedback before chopping into
> small patch requests. As well as indicating where I am heading. Or is
> that just waste of human bandwidth?

Depends. Post 100 RFC patches, i won't look at them. Post 21 with a
cover note making it clear you are planning to submit them in blocks
of 7, i might.

But it is best to assume reviewers have small blocks of time. 21
patches take 3 times a long to review as 7. The block of time might
not be enough for 21, so the review gets differed. 7 are more likely
to fit in the available time, so it happens quickly.

   Andrew