[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1501136819-21857-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:26:59 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] userfaultfd_zeropage: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone
In the non-cooperative userfaultfd case, the process exit may race with
outstanding mcopy_atomic called by the uffd monitor. Returning -ENOSPC
instead of -EINVAL when mm is already gone will allow uffd monitor to
distinguish this case from other error conditions.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 96333187ab162 ("userfaultfd_copy: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone")
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Unfortunately, I've overlooked userfaultfd_zeropage when I updated
userfaultd_copy :(
fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index cadcd12a3d35..2d8c2d848668 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1643,6 +1643,8 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
ret = mfill_zeropage(ctx->mm, uffdio_zeropage.range.start,
uffdio_zeropage.range.len);
mmput(ctx->mm);
+ } else {
+ return -ENOSPC;
}
if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_zeropage->zeropage)))
return -EFAULT;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists