[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170727133202.GA1875@nanopsycho>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:32:02 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>, corbet@....net,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/10] net: dsa: lan9303: added sysfs node
swe_bcst_throt
Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:26:25PM CEST, andrew@...n.ch wrote:
>> Yes, this setting can be used to reduce effect of broadcast storms.
>
>So one way to solve this is to teach the software bridge about
>broadcast storm control. Put some rate limiting into its broadcast
>flood handling. Then add a switchdev call which passes this down into
>the switch.
>
>Or look at doing it via TC. It is just a filter selecting broadcast
>traffic and applying some shaping, which is what TC is all about.
Ack. This is probably the way to do this. Definitelly no sysfs knob...
>
>Generic solutions which can be used by all switches are likely to be
>accepted.
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists