linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3.1 0/3] soc: amlogic: Add Amlogic SoC Information driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7h4ltxs8to.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:29:07 -0700
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        carlo@...one.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1 0/3] soc: amlogic: Add Amlogic SoC Information driver

Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> writes:

> On 07/12/2017 09:03 PM, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
>> Hi Kevin,
>> 
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Neil Armstrong
>> <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
>>> Amlogic SoCs have a SoC information register for SoC type, package type and
>>> revision information.
>>> This patchset adds support for this register decoding and exposing with the
>>> SoC bus infrastructure, with dt-bindings and DT node.
>> I'm curious: are you going to take this through your tree or are we
>> waiting for someone's ACK here?
>
> I'm curious also, it should go through armsoc-drivers, no ?

I was being lazy and assuming that Arnd would have another look as he
reviewed an earlier version, but since there appear to be no further
reviews/comments, I'll take it through the amlogic tree in the
v4.14/drivers branch.

Kevin