[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1501243382.5386.4.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:03:02 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jmattson@...gle.com, wanpeng.li@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: nVMX: fixes to nested virt interrupt injection
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 13:53 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 28/07/2017 10:24, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:03 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> With these two patches, KVM does not blindly pass the exit interruption
> >> info and exit qualification from the vmcs02 and vmcs12 when injecting
> >> an exception. There were two spots where this was done, namely
> >> nested_vmx_check_exception and vmx_inject_page_fault_nested.
> >>
> >> Patch 1 avoids writing the vmcs02's VM_EXIT_INTR_ERROR_CODE field,
> >> which as Jim noticed isn't possible on pre-Haswell machines, but
> >> otherwise has no semantic effect.
> >>
> >> Patch 2 is the actual bugfix.
> >
> > I was looking into oodles of lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use warnings in
> > RT, introduced by KVM: LAPIC: Fix lapic timer injection delay, when I
> > noticed this post. Happily, I can report that they are history.
>
> This patch won't fix them. They are a race that comes and goes---but
> yes, it's fixed.
Yes, I just discovered that they had merely gone into hiding.
(and retrieved the patch that really really makes them dead)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists