[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAALAos-9mNg+pkj+F40ByRZWT5U_y7OeW19RxD_cR+8eq-_wdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:09:45 +0530
From: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...adcom.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Device Tree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dma: bcm-sba-raid: Peek mbox when we are left with no
free requests
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:25:25AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:06:40AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
>> >> We should peek mbox channels when we are left with no free
>> >> sba_requests in sba_alloc_request()
>> >
>> > and why is the world should we do that, how does that help??
>>
>> When setting up RAID array on several NVMe disk we observed
>> that sba_alloc_request() start failing (due to no free requests left)
>> and RAID array setup becomes very slow.
>>
>> Doing mbox channel peek when we have no free requests left,
>> improves performance of RAID array setup.
>
> How about documenting this tribal knowledge in the changelog. Changelogs are
> very useful, 6 months down the line, you will struggle to remember why this
> was changed..
Sure, I will have detailed commit description for this.
Regards,
Anup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists