linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tap: XDP support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a53d61f5-584c-db8a-be1f-ddec0666d7df@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:50:45 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tap: XDP support



On 2017年07月28日 11:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:28:54AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> +	old_prog = rtnl_dereference(tun->xdp_prog);
>>>> +	if (old_prog)
>>>> +		bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
>>>> +	rcu_assign_pointer(tun->xdp_prog, prog);
>>> Is this OK?  Could this lead to the program getting freed and then
>>> datapath accessing a stale pointer?  I mean in the scenario where the
>>> process gets pre-empted between the bpf_prog_put() and
>>> rcu_assign_pointer()?
>> Will call bpf_prog_put() after rcu_assign_pointer().
> I suspect you need to sync RCU or something before that.

__bpf_prog_put() will do call_rcu(), so looks like it was ok.

Thanks