[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170729224305.GE5664@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:43:05 -0700
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, corbet@....net, mhocko@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 13/62] powerpc: track allocation status of all pkeys
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:01:44AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Hello Ram,
>
> I'm still going through the patches and haven't formed a full picture of
> the feature in my mind yet, so my comments today won't be particularly
> insightful...
>
> But hopefully the comments that I currently have will be helpful anyway.
sure. thanx for taking the time to look through the patches.
>
> Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com> writes:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> > index 203d7de..09b268e 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> > @@ -2,21 +2,87 @@
> > #define _ASM_PPC64_PKEYS_H
> >
> > extern bool pkey_inited;
> > -#define ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS 0
> > +#define arch_max_pkey() 32
> > +#define ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS (VM_PKEY_BIT0 | VM_PKEY_BIT1 | VM_PKEY_BIT2 | \
> > + VM_PKEY_BIT3 | VM_PKEY_BIT4)
> > +/*
> > + * Bits are in BE format.
> > + * NOTE: key 31, 1, 0 are not used.
> > + * key 0 is used by default. It give read/write/execute permission.
> > + * key 31 is reserved by the hypervisor.
> > + * key 1 is recommended to be not used.
> > + * PowerISA(3.0) page 1015, programming note.
> > + */
> > +#define PKEY_INITIAL_ALLOCAION 0xc0000001
>
> There's a typo in the macro name, should be "ALLOCATION".
Thanks fixed it. The new version of the code, calculates the
allocation_mask at runtime, depending on the number of keys specified by
the device tree as well as other factors. So the above macro is
replaced by a variable 'initial_allocation_mask'.
RP
>
> --
> Thiago Jung Bauermann
> IBM Linux Technology Center
--
Ram Pai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists