[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1501296502.12260.19.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 04:48:22 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] memdelay: memory health metric for systems and
workloads
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 11:30 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> Structure
>
> The first patch cleans up the different loadavg callsites and macros
> as the memdelay averages are going to be tracked using these.
>
> The second patch adds a distinction between page cache transitions
> (inactive list refaults) and page cache thrashing (active list
> refaults), since only the latter are unproductive refaults.
>
> The third patch finally adds the memdelay accounting and interface:
> its scheduler side identifies productive and unproductive task states,
> and the VM side aggregates them into system and cgroup domain states
> and calculates moving averages of the time spent in each state.
What tree is this against? ttwu asm delta says "measure me".
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists