linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: meson: gxbb-aoclk: Add CEC 32k clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <389b0cd5-4c93-e043-9c55-02bd56f590cf@free.fr>
Date:   Sat, 29 Jul 2017 10:04:39 +0200
From:   Chris Moore <moore@...e.fr>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, jbrunet@...libre.com
Cc:     linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: meson: gxbb-aoclk: Add CEC 32k clock

Hi,

Sorry I forgot to reply to all in my previous post :(
I hope this corrects things.

Le 28/07/2017 à 11:53, Neil Armstrong a écrit :

[snip]

> +static long aoclk_cec_32k_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long 
> rate,
> +                     unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> +    const struct cec_32k_freq_table *freq = find_cec_32k_freq(rate,
> +                                  *prate);
> +
> +    /* If invalid return first one */
> +    if (!freq)
> +        return freq[0].target_rate;

Wouldn't this dereference a null pointer (or am I being stupid this 
morning)?

> +
> +    return freq->target_rate;
> +}
> +
> +static int aoclk_cec_32k_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +                  unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +    const struct cec_32k_freq_table *freq = find_cec_32k_freq(rate,
> +                                  parent_rate);
> +    struct aoclk_cec_32k *cec_32k = to_aoclk_cec_32k(hw);
> +    u32 reg = 0;
> +
> +    if (!freq)
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +
> +    /* Disable clock */
> +    regmap_update_bits(cec_32k->regmap, AO_RTC_ALT_CLK_CNTL0,
> +               CLK_CNTL0_IN_GATE_EN | CLK_CNTL0_OUT_GATE_EN, 0);
> +
> +    if (freq->dualdiv)
> +        reg = CLK_CNTL0_DUALDIV_EN |
> +              FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N1_MASK, freq->n1 - 1) |
> +              FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N2_MASK, freq->n2 - 1);
> +    else
> +        reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N1_MASK, freq->n1 - 1);
> +

Suggestion:

+    reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N1_MASK, freq->n1 - 1);
+    if (freq->dualdiv)
+        reg |= CLK_CNTL0_DUALDIV_EN |
+               FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N2_MASK, freq->n2 - 1);

is shorter but maybe generates the same code.

> + regmap_write(cec_32k->regmap, AO_RTC_ALT_CLK_CNTL0, reg);
> +
> +    if (freq->dualdiv)
> +        reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M1_MASK, freq->m1 - 1) |
> +              FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M2_MASK, freq->m2 - 1);
> +    else
> +        reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M1_MASK, freq->m1 - 1);
> +

Idem:

+    reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M1_MASK, freq->m1 - 1);
+    if (freq->dualdiv)
+        reg |= FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M2_MASK, freq->m2 - 1);

Cheers,
Chris