[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170730144128.2lvg6vxohsbmxw63@piout.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 16:41:28 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>
Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
wens@...e.org, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtc: sun6i: Remove unneeded initalization of ret in
sun6i_rtc_setalarm()
Hi,
On 12/07/2017 at 11:59:50 +0100, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> index 77bc4d3..1886b85 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int sun6i_rtc_setalarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *wkalrm)
> unsigned long time_now = 0;
> unsigned long time_set = 0;
> unsigned long time_gap = 0;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
I don't see any reason that would justify that change.
> ret = sun6i_rtc_gettime(dev, &tm_now);
> if (ret < 0) {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists