[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CxdoLoaRR6_7+PCU+wtyX9O24vU9euhw=Ws_SJAZ58n7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 06:25:17 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: fix a race condition result to lost INIT
2017-07-30 19:33 GMT+08:00 <peng.hao2@....com.cn>:
>
>
>
>
>>2017-07-30 18:42 GMT+08:00 <peng.hao2@....com.cn>:
>
>>>> 2017-07-31 0:24 GMT+08:00 Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>:
>>>
>>>> > when SMP VM start, AP may lost INIT because of receiving INIT between
>>>> > kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get/set_vcpu_events.
>>>> >
>>>> > vcpu 0 vcpu 1
>>>> > kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events
>>>> > events->smi.latched_init=0
>>>> > send INIT to vcpu1
>>>> > set vcpu1's pending_events
>>>> > kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events
>>>> > events->smi.latched_init == 0
>>>> > clear INIT in pending_events
>>>> > I don't think it need set/clear kernel state according to userspace's
>>>> > info.
>>>> >
>>>> > Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
>>>> > ---
>>>> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 ------
>>>> > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>>> >
>>>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> > index 6c7266f..393a7b7 100644
>>>> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> > @@ -3157,12 +3157,6 @@ static int
>>>> > kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>> > vcpu->arch.hflags |= HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK;
>>>> > else
>>>> > vcpu->arch.hflags &= ~HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK;
>>>> > - if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu)) {
>>>> > - if (events->smi.latched_init)
>>>> > - set_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT,
>>>> > &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
>>>
>>>> This is not correct, you will lose the INIT after live migration. I
>>>> just send out another patch to fix it. Thanks for the report.
>>>
>>> yes, you're right. I should modify on qemu not kernel.
>
>>There is a patch here to fix it in kvm, https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/30/72
>
>>>
>
> I was affected by sipi, kernel never report valid sipi to user space,
>
> we don't care whether sipi is lost after migration. Why?
Please refer to Paolo's suggestion,
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg464882.html
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>
>>>> > - else
>>>> > - clear_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT,
>>>> > &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
>>>> > - }
>>>> > }
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists