[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170731084411.GO5176@cbox>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:44:11 +0200
From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
To: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@...aro.org>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, corbet@....net, pbonzini@...hat.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
david.daney@...ium.com, mark.rutland@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, stefan@...lo-penguin.com,
andy.gross@...aro.org, wcohen@...hat.com,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, shankerd@...eaurora.org,
vladimir.murzin@....com, james.morse@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 28/38] KVM: arm64: Emulate EL12 register accesses
from the virtual EL2
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:58:54AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> With HCR_EL2.NV bit set, accesses to EL12 registers in the virtual EL2
> trap to EL2. Handle those traps just like we do for EL1 registers.
>
> One exception is CNTKCTL_EL12. We don't trap on CNTKCTL_EL1 for non-VHE
> virtual EL2 because we don't have to. However, accessing CNTKCTL_EL12
> will trap since it's one of the EL12 registers controlled by HCR_EL2.NV
> bit. Therefore, add a handler for it and don't treat it as a
> non-trap-registers when preparing a shadow context.
I'm sorry, I don't remember the details, and I don't understand from
this paragraph what the difference between CNTKCTL_EL12 and the other
EL12 registers is?
>
> Move EL12 system register macros to a common place to reuse them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h | 24 ------------------------
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/context.c | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> index 4572a9b..353b895 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> @@ -73,30 +73,6 @@
> #define read_sysreg_el1(r) read_sysreg_elx(r, _EL1, _EL12)
> #define write_sysreg_el1(v,r) write_sysreg_elx(v, r, _EL1, _EL12)
>
> -/* The VHE specific system registers and their encoding */
> -#define sctlr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 0)
> -#define cpacr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 2)
> -#define ttbr0_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 0)
> -#define ttbr1_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 1)
> -#define tcr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 2)
> -#define afsr0_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 0)
> -#define afsr1_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 1)
> -#define esr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 2, 0)
> -#define far_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 6, 0, 0)
> -#define mair_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 10, 2, 0)
> -#define amair_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 10, 3, 0)
> -#define vbar_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 12, 0, 0)
> -#define contextidr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 13, 0, 1)
> -#define cntkctl_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 1, 0)
> -#define cntp_tval_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 2, 0)
> -#define cntp_ctl_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 2, 1)
> -#define cntp_cval_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 2, 2)
> -#define cntv_tval_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 0)
> -#define cntv_ctl_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 1)
> -#define cntv_cval_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 2)
> -#define spsr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 0)
> -#define elr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 1)
> -
> /**
> * hyp_alternate_select - Generates patchable code sequences that are
> * used to switch between two implementations of a function, depending
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index b01c608..b8d4d0c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -338,6 +338,30 @@
> #define SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 0, 3)
> #define SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 1, 0)
>
> +/* The VHE specific system registers and their encoding */
> +#define sctlr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 0)
> +#define cpacr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 2)
> +#define ttbr0_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 0)
> +#define ttbr1_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 1)
> +#define tcr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 2)
> +#define afsr0_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 0)
> +#define afsr1_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 1)
> +#define esr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 2, 0)
> +#define far_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 6, 0, 0)
> +#define mair_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 10, 2, 0)
> +#define amair_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 10, 3, 0)
> +#define vbar_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 12, 0, 0)
> +#define contextidr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 13, 0, 1)
> +#define cntkctl_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 1, 0)
> +#define cntp_tval_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 2, 0)
> +#define cntp_ctl_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 2, 1)
> +#define cntp_cval_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 2, 2)
> +#define cntv_tval_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 0)
> +#define cntv_ctl_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 1)
> +#define cntv_cval_EL02 sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 2)
> +#define spsr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 0)
> +#define elr_EL12 sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 1)
> +
> #define SYS_SP_EL2 sys_reg(3, 6, 4, 1, 0)
>
> /* Common SCTLR_ELx flags. */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> index e1bc753..f3d3398 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,13 @@ static void copy_shadow_non_trap_el1_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool setup)
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(el1_non_trap_regs); i++) {
> const int sr = el1_non_trap_regs[i];
>
> + /*
> + * We trap on cntkctl_el12 accesses from virtual EL2 as suppose
as opposed to ?
> + * to not trapping on cntlctl_el1 accesses.
> + */
> + if (vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu) && sr == CNTKCTL_EL1)
> + continue;
> +
If the guest can still access CNTHCTL_EL2 via the CNTKCTL_EL1 system
regsiter access encoding without trapping, why is the don't we need to
copy this here?
Is the point that for a VHE guest, we don't copy vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu,
CNTKCTL_EL1) to the hardware CNTKCTL_EL1, but we copy vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu,
CNTHCTL_EL2) into CNTKCTL_EL1 during the world switch instead?
Thanks,
-Christoffer
> if (setup)
> s_sys_regs[sr] = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, sr);
> else
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index b3e0cb8..2aa922c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -905,6 +905,14 @@ static inline void access_rw(struct sys_reg_params *p, u64 *sysreg)
> *sysreg = p->regval;
> }
>
> +static bool access_cntkctl_el12(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + access_rw(p, &vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg));
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static u64 *get_special_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p)
> {
> u64 reg = sys_reg(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2);
> @@ -1201,6 +1209,23 @@ static bool access_cpacr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_val, CNTVOFF_EL2, 0 },
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_val, CNTHCTL_EL2, 0 },
>
> + { SYS_DESC(sctlr_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_val, SCTLR_EL1, 0x00C50078 },
> + { SYS_DESC(cpacr_EL12), access_cpacr, reset_val, CPACR_EL1, 0 },
> + { SYS_DESC(ttbr0_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, TTBR0_EL1 },
> + { SYS_DESC(ttbr1_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, TTBR1_EL1 },
> + { SYS_DESC(tcr_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_val, TCR_EL1, 0 },
> + { SYS_DESC(spsr_EL12), access_spsr},
> + { SYS_DESC(elr_EL12), access_elr},
> + { SYS_DESC(afsr0_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, AFSR0_EL1 },
> + { SYS_DESC(afsr1_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, AFSR1_EL1 },
> + { SYS_DESC(esr_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, ESR_EL1 },
> + { SYS_DESC(far_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, FAR_EL1 },
> + { SYS_DESC(mair_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, MAIR_EL1 },
> + { SYS_DESC(amair_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_amair_el1, AMAIR_EL1 },
> + { SYS_DESC(vbar_EL12), access_vbar, reset_val, VBAR_EL1, 0 },
> + { SYS_DESC(contextidr_EL12), access_vm_reg, reset_val, CONTEXTIDR_EL1, 0 },
> + { SYS_DESC(cntkctl_EL12), access_cntkctl_el12, reset_val, CNTKCTL_EL1, 0 },
> +
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL2), NULL, reset_special, SP_EL2, 0},
> };
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists