[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9975fac37c34fcc83a43fc797d0dbf7e463a038f.1501496603.git.panand@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:10:33 +0530
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, will.deacon@....com, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: fault: re-enable irq if it was disabled for single stepping
We disable irq before single stepping and re-enable it after it.
However, if stepped instruction will cause a fault then we will enter
into fault handler with interrupt disabled, which is not desired.
But, we should be safe if we re-enable interrupt in fault handler if
it was disabled for single stepping.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index ce5290dacba3..2b88807eb964 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -589,6 +589,8 @@ static const struct fault_info fault_info[] = {
{ do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 63" },
};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, irq_enable_needed);
+
/*
* Dispatch a data abort to the relevant handler.
*/
@@ -597,6 +599,12 @@ asmlinkage void __exception do_mem_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
{
const struct fault_info *inf = esr_to_fault_info(esr);
struct siginfo info;
+ bool *irq_en_needed = this_cpu_ptr(&irq_enable_needed);
+
+ if (*irq_en_needed) {
+ regs->pstate &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
+ *irq_en_needed = false;
+ }
if (!inf->fn(addr, esr, regs))
return;
@@ -672,8 +680,6 @@ void __init hook_debug_fault_code(int nr,
debug_fault_info[nr].name = name;
}
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, irq_enable_needed);
-
asmlinkage int __exception do_debug_exception(unsigned long addr,
unsigned int esr,
struct pt_regs *regs)
--
2.9.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists