[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170731125319.GA4829@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:53:19 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
qiuxishi@...wei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com>,
slaoub@...il.com, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm, memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from
hotadded memory
On Mon 31-07-17 14:35:21, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:19:41 +0200
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu 27-07-17 08:56:52, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 26-07-17 17:06:59, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > This does not seems to be an opt-in change ie if i am reading patch 3
> > > > correctly if an altmap is not provided to __add_pages() you fallback
> > > > to allocating from begining of zone. This will not work with HMM ie
> > > > device private memory. So at very least i would like to see some way
> > > > to opt-out of this. Maybe a new argument like bool forbid_altmap ?
> > >
> > > OK, I see! I will think about how to make a sane api for that.
> >
> > This is what I came up with. s390 guys mentioned that I cannot simply
> > use the new range at this stage yet. This will need probably some other
> > changes but I guess we want an opt-in approach with an arch veto in general.
> >
> > So what do you think about the following? Only x86 is update now and I
> > will split it into two parts but the idea should be clear at least.
>
> This looks good, and the kernel will also boot again on s390 when applied
> on top of the other 5 patches (plus adding the s390 part here).
Thanks for testing Gerald! I am still undecided whether the arch code
should veto MHP_RANGE_ACCESSIBLE if it cannot be supported or just set
it when it is supported. My last post did the later but the first one
sounds like a more clear API to me. I will keep thinking about it.
Anyway, did you have any chance to consider mapping the new physical
memory range inside arch_add_memory rather than during online on s390?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists