linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure in the staging tree (Was: kisskb: FAILED linux-next/s390-allmodconfig/s390x Mon Jul 31, 17:24)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170731155850.GD1262@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:58:50 -0700
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure in the staging tree (Was: kisskb:
 FAILED linux-next/s390-allmodconfig/s390x Mon Jul 31, 17:24)

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:55:14AM +0000, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> That's because the fsl-mc driver selects GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN and not 
> all arches implement the support for the option. I can submit a patch 
> that adds explicit dependencies on arches that it was build-tested (x86, 
> arm, powerpc, all both 32 and 64 bits) similar to how it's done here 
> [1]. Let me know if you're ok with this fix and i'll submit the fix to 
> staging.

Ugh, you should not be selecting that option, but rather depending on
the option, right?

thanks,

greg k-h