linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs, xfs: introduce S_IOMAP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h_YWaAXG5pfkOJ0M74i5yEke1SoC3ESErTh41hngtG-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:29:49 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Colin Walters <walters@...bum.org>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs, xfs: introduce S_IOMAP_IMMUTABLE

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Colin Walters <walters@...bum.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017, at 03:43 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> An inode with this flag set indicates that the file's block map cannot
>> be changed, no size change, deletion, hole-punch, range collapse, or
>> reflink.
>>
>> The implementation of toggling the flag and sealing the state of the
>> extent map is saved for a later patch. The functionality provided by
>> S_IOMAP_IMMUTABLE, once toggle support is added, will be a superset of
>> that provided by S_SWAPFILE, and it is targeted to replace it.
>>
>> For now, only xfs and the core vfs are updated to consider the new flag.
>
> Quite a while ago I started a request for O_OBJECT:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg75085.html
> A few months ago I was thinking about that more and realized
> it'd likely be more palatable to land as an inode flag, like
> you're doing here.
>
> Now, S_IOMAP_IMMUTABLE would be quite close to the semantics
> I want for ostree, except we also want to disallow
> changes to the inode uid, gid or mode.  (Extended attributes are
> a whole other story; but I'd like to at least disallow changes to the
> security. namespace).
>
> The goal here is mostly about resilience to *accidental* changes;
> think an admin doing `cp /path/to/binary /usr/bin/bash` which
> does open(O_TRUNC), which would hence corrupt all hardlinks.
>
> S_IOMAP_IMMUTABLE would give a lot of great protection against
> those types of accidental changes - most of them are either going
> to be open(O_TRUNC) or O_APPEND.   Since you're touching various
> write paths here, perhaps we can also add
> S_CONTENTS_IMMUTABLE or something at the same time?
>
> If this lands as is - I'm quite likely to change ostree to use it;
> any objections to that?  As mentioned in the thread, there are several
> other cases of "content immutable" files in userspace, such as
> QEMU "qcow2", git objects.  And really the most classic example is
> /etc/sudoers and the need for a special "visudo" program to really
> ensure that editors don't do in-place overwrites.
>
> But it'd be great if we can use this push to also land "content immutabilty"
> or however we decide to call it.

How is S_CONTENTS_IMMUTABLE different than S_IMMUTABLE?