[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170731172637.29355-27-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:26:04 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 26/59] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE interrupt masking
When masking/unmasking a doorbell interrupt, it is necessary
to issue an invalidation to the corresponding redistributor.
We use the DirectLPI feature by writting directly to the corresponding
redistributor.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 5 +++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 1 +
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
index 8d45e88feac9..550fb0bcccf8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
@@ -276,6 +276,11 @@ static inline u64 __gic_readq_nonatomic(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
#define gicr_write_pendbaser(v, c) __gic_writeq_nonatomic(v, c)
/*
+ * GICR_xLPIR - only the lower bits are significant
+ */
+#define gic_write_lpir(v, c) writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(v), c)
+
+/*
* GITS_TYPER is an ID register and doesn't need atomicity.
*/
#define gits_read_typer(c) __gic_readq_nonatomic(c)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
index 0d2a53457c30..c2de3ff374a0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ static inline void gic_write_bpr1(u32 val)
#define gic_read_typer(c) readq_relaxed(c)
#define gic_write_irouter(v, c) writeq_relaxed(v, c)
+#define gic_write_lpir(v, c) writeq_relaxed(v, c)
#define gic_flush_dcache_to_poc(a,l) __flush_dcache_area((a), (l))
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 0a9aedaf6da2..d871d105be9d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -2330,8 +2330,39 @@ static int its_vpe_set_vcpu_affinity(struct irq_data *d, void *vcpu_info)
}
}
+static void its_vpe_send_inv(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ void __iomem *rdbase;
+
+ rdbase = per_cpu_ptr(gic_rdists->rdist, vpe->col_idx)->rd_base;
+ gic_write_lpir(vpe->vpe_db_lpi, rdbase + GICR_INVLPIR);
+}
+
+static void its_vpe_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ /*
+ * We need to unmask the LPI, which is described by the parent
+ * irq_data. Instead of calling into the parent (which won't
+ * exactly do the right thing, let's simply use the
+ * parent_data pointer. Yes, I'm naughty.
+ */
+ lpi_write_config(d->parent_data, LPI_PROP_ENABLED, 0);
+ its_vpe_send_inv(d);
+}
+
+static void its_vpe_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ /* Same hack as above... */
+ lpi_write_config(d->parent_data, 0, LPI_PROP_ENABLED);
+ its_vpe_send_inv(d);
+}
+
static struct irq_chip its_vpe_irq_chip = {
.name = "GICv4-vpe",
+ .irq_mask = its_vpe_mask_irq,
+ .irq_unmask = its_vpe_unmask_irq,
+ .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
.irq_set_affinity = its_vpe_set_affinity,
.irq_set_vcpu_affinity = its_vpe_set_vcpu_affinity,
};
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists