| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 00:16:45 +0200
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Issue with commit de3ef1eb1cd - PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from
struct dev_pm_info [Was: MEI-related WARN_ON() triggered during
resume-from-sleep on v4.13-rc2+]
Rafael, Mika, Bjorn and Tomas,
can't explain exactly what causes breakage between MEI and PM first seen on
v4.13-rc2 (ther was a typo in the orignal message), but I was able to bisect
it down to commit
[de3ef1eb1cd0cc3a75f7a3661e10ed827f370ab8] PM / core: Drop run_wake flag from struct dev_pm_info
Here's the original bug report with the reply by the maintainer:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:16:56AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dominik Brodowski [mailto:linux@...inikbrodowski.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2017 11:59
> > To: Winkler, Tomas <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > Cc: Usyskin, Alexander <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: MEI-related WARN_ON() triggered during resume-from-sleep on
> > v4.12-rc2+
> >
> > Thomas,
> >
> > on Linus' most recent kernel (v4.12-rc2, git head 0a07b238e5f48), I see the
> > following message on my Dell XPS13 when resuming from sleep. MEI is,
> > AFAIK, not being used on this system:
> >
>
> Thanks for the report, we haven't change the logic of this code since 4.12 so we need to look for
> changes in pci and/or pm subsystems. We try to bisect it.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> > [ 192.940537] Restarting tasks ...
> > [ 192.940610] PGI is not set
> > [ 192.940619] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 192.940623] WARNING: CPU: 0
> > PID: 1661 at /home/brodo/local/kernel/git/linux/drivers/misc/mei/hw-
> > me.c:653 mei_me_pg_exit_sync+0x351/0x360 [ 192.940624] Modules linked
> > in:
> > [ 192.940627] CPU: 0 PID: 1661 Comm: kworker/0:3 Not tainted 4.13.0-rc2+
> > #2 [ 192.940628] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9343/0TM99H, BIOS A11
> > 12/08/2016 [ 192.940630] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work <snip> [
> > 192.940642] Call Trace:
> > [ 192.940646] ? pci_pme_active+0x1de/0x1f0 [ 192.940649] ?
> > pci_restore_standard_config+0x50/0x50
> > [ 192.940651] ? kfree+0x172/0x190
> > [ 192.940653] ? kfree+0x172/0x190
> > [ 192.940655] ? pci_restore_standard_config+0x50/0x50
> > [ 192.940663] mei_me_pm_runtime_resume+0x3f/0xc0
> > [ 192.940665] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x7a/0xa0 [ 192.940667]
> > __rpm_callback+0xb9/0x1e0 [ 192.940668] ?
> > preempt_count_add+0x6d/0xc0 [ 192.940670] rpm_callback+0x24/0x90 [
> > 192.940672] ? pci_restore_standard_config+0x50/0x50
> > [ 192.940674] rpm_resume+0x4e8/0x800
> > [ 192.940676] pm_runtime_work+0x55/0xb0 [ 192.940678]
> > process_one_work+0x184/0x3e0 [ 192.940680] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3a0 [
> > 192.940681] ? preempt_count_sub+0x9b/0x100 [ 192.940683]
> > kthread+0x122/0x140 [ 192.940684] ? process_one_work+0x3e0/0x3e0 [
> > 192.940685] ? __kthread_create_on_node+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > [ 192.940688] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
> > [ 192.940690] Code: 96 3a 9e ff 48 8b 7d 98 e8 cd 21 58 00 83 bb bc 01 00 00
> > 04 0f 85 40 fe ff ff e9 41 fe ff ff 48 c7 c7 5f 04 99 96 e8 93 6b 9f ff <0f> ff e9 5d
> > fd ff ff e8 33 fe 99 ff 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 [ 192.940719] ---[ end trace
> > a86955597774ead8 ]--- [ 192.942540] done.
> >
> > This doesn't / didn't happen on v4.12.
By using the dynamic_debug infrastructure, I was able to obtain a few more
data points:
Running 0847684cfc5f, when suspending the system to ram and resuming again,
I see the following messages:
[ 614.936773] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Stopping disk
[ 614.956004] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: rpm: me: runtime resume
[ 614.956165] ACPI : EC: event blocked
[ 614.980164] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: interrupt source 0x00000002
[ 614.980191] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: function called after ISR to handle the interrupt processing.
...
[ 615.266896] Suspended for 1.190 seconds
...
[ 615.455775] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
[ 615.455855] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: interrupt source 0x00000002
[ 615.455870] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: function called after ISR to handle the interrupt processing.
[ 615.455877] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: we need to start the dev.
and everything works fine as expected (no WARN(), no stack trace, nothing
dubious).
Running de3ef1eb1cd0 instead, when suspending, I see *no* mei_me-related
message. During resume, the stack trace already noted above for
v4.13-rc2+ appears again:
[ 80.333909] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Stopping disk
[ 80.535777] psmouse serio1: Failed to disable mouse on isa0060/serio1
[ 80.983510] ACPI : EC: event blocked
[ 81.065510] PM: suspend of devices complete after 734.074 msecs
...
[ 82.137038] Restarting tasks ...
[ 82.143986] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: rpm: me: runtime resume
[ 82.143989] PGI is not set
[ 82.144001] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 82.144008] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1881 at /home/brodo/local/kernel/git/linux/drivers/misc/mei/hw-me.c:653 mei_me_pg_exit_sync+0x351/0x360
[ 82.144009] Modules linked in:
[ 82.144012] CPU: 3 PID: 1881 Comm: kworker/3:5 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc5+ #3
[ 82.144013] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9343/0TM99H, BIOS A11 12/08/2016
...
[ 82.144017] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
[ 82.144019] task: ffff964a91b35700 task.stack: ffffa51b43508000
[ 82.144022] RIP: 0010:mei_me_pg_exit_sync+0x351/0x360
...
[ 82.144156] ---[ end trace 5827b2fcedec4bc9 ]---
[ 82.144272] done.
...
[ 83.194425] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: rpm: me: runtime resume ret = -62
[ 83.194460] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: unexpected reset: dev_state = ENABLED fw status = 1E000245 6000A106 00000200 00004400 00000101 43C00ED9
...
Any ideas?
Best,
Dominik
PS @Tomas: Sorry for mistyping your first name in the previous message.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists