[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c66ea0e-f1dd-227a-56ec-a5325bf48027@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:37:19 -0500
From: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ccp - avoid uninitialized variable warning
On 07/31/2017 03:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The added support for version 5 CCPs introduced a false-positive
> warning in the RSA implementation:
>
> drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-ops.c: In function 'ccp_run_rsa_cmd':
> drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-ops.c:1856:3: error: 'sb_count' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>
> This changes the code in a way that should make it easier for
> the compiler to track the state of the sb_count variable, and
> avoid the warning.
>
> Fixes: 6ba46c7d4d7e ("crypto: ccp - Fix base RSA function for version 5 CCPs")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-ops.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-ops.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-ops.c
> index 40c062ad8726..a8bc207b099a 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-ops.c
> @@ -1758,6 +1758,7 @@ static int ccp_run_rsa_cmd(struct ccp_cmd_queue *cmd_q, struct ccp_cmd *cmd)
> o_len = 32 * ((rsa->key_size + 255) / 256);
> i_len = o_len * 2;
>
> + sb_count = 0;
> if (cmd_q->ccp->vdata->version < CCP_VERSION(5, 0)) {
> /* sb_count is the number of storage block slots required
> * for the modulus.
> @@ -1852,7 +1853,7 @@ static int ccp_run_rsa_cmd(struct ccp_cmd_queue *cmd_q, struct ccp_cmd *cmd)
> ccp_dm_free(&exp);
>
> e_sb:
> - if (cmd_q->ccp->vdata->version < CCP_VERSION(5, 0))
> + if (sb_count)
> cmd_q->ccp->vdata->perform->sbfree(cmd_q, op.sb_key, sb_count);
>
> return ret;
>
Reviewed-by: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists