[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW4s-mGKoTSBqXV4J4agX2uRVoQkTUwGrzo43USsKd+qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:52:33 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: get rid of paravirt op adjust_exception_frame
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
> On 01/08/2017 20:45, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Also, IMO it would be nice to fully finish the job. Remaining steps are:
>>
>> 1. Unsuck the SYSCALL entries on Xen PV.
>> 2. Unsuck the SYENTER entry on Xen PV.
>> 3. Make a xen_nmi that's actually correct (should be trivial)
>>
>> #1 is here:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/entry_syscall&id=14fee348e3e86c994400d68085217d1232a637d6
>
> If the
>
> /* Zero-extending 32-bit regs, do not remove */
> movl %eax, %eax
>
> comments are to be believed, then the entry logic needs reordering
> slightly to:
>
> GLOBAL(entry_*_compat_after_hwframe)
> movl %eax, %eax /* Zero-extending 32-bit regs, do not remove */
> pushq %rax /* pt_regs->orig_ax */
D'oh, right. Juergen, want to make that change?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists