[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170801075728.GE6524@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 09:57:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for
systems and workloads
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:41:42PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > So could you start by describing what actual statistics we need? Because
> > as is the scheduler already does a gazillion stats and why can't re
> > repurpose some of those?
>
> If that's possible, that would be great of course.
>
> We want to be able to tell how many tasks in a domain (the system or a
> memory cgroup) are inside a memdelay section as opposed to how many
And you haven't even defined wth a memdelay section is yet..
> are in a "productive" state such as runnable or iowait. Then derive
> from that whether the domain as a whole is unproductive (all non-idle
> tasks memdelayed), or partially unproductive (some delayed, but CPUs
> are productive or there are iowait tasks). Then derive the percentages
> of walltime the domain spends partially or fully unproductive.
>
> For that we need per-domain counters for
>
> 1) nr of tasks in memdelay sections
> 2) nr of iowait or runnable/queued tasks that are NOT inside
> memdelay sections
And I still have no clue..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists