linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: dts: Add Mediatek SoC MT2712 and evaluation board dts and Makefile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:51:21 +0800
From:   Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: dts: Add Mediatek SoC MT2712 and
 evaluation board dts and Makefile

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 19:37 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1e135af
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi

<...>

> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> +		interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13
> +			      (GIC_CPU_MASK_RAW(0x13) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 14
> +			      (GIC_CPU_MASK_RAW(0x13) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 11
> +			      (GIC_CPU_MASK_RAW(0x13) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 10
> +			      (GIC_CPU_MASK_RAW(0x13) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> +	};
> +
> +	soc {
> +		#address-cells = <2>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
> +		ranges;

Matthias,

I notice this have soc node.
Do we need to get rid of it?

Joe.C