lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:56:55 +0100
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@....linux.org.uk, Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] drivers base/arch_topology: free cpumask
 cpus_to_visit

Hi Greg,

On 28/07/17 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-07-17, 20:33, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > Free cpumask cpus_to_visit in case registering
> > init_cpu_capacity_notifier has failed or the parsing of the cpu
> > capacity-dmips-mhz property is done. The cpumask cpus_to_visit is
> > only used inside the notifier call init_cpu_capacity_callback.
> > 
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
> > Reported-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> > Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> > Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

This is actually a fix/optimization which is orthogonal to the rest of
the set. Would it make sense to take only this for now and keep
reviewing the other patches?

Thanks,

- Juri

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ