linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: drop unnecessary includes from include/linux/gpio/driver.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VeLwM8Q5vVLeeGz9hL8AWa2J47NTaeX0ogJk6v7y18diw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:04:26 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
        David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: drop unnecessary includes from include/linux/gpio/driver.h

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 15:48 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>>> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

>>> > If Linus is okay with the following proposal I would rather go with
>>> > it,
>>> > i.e. logical split the series to
>>> >
>>> > 1. Fix IRQ related headers inclusion
>>> > 2. Fix pinconf-generic.h inclusion
>>> > 3. Fix OF headers inclusion (btw, of_gpio.h is not enough there?)
>>>
>>> That works fine with me, but also one big patch actually, I do not
>>> want to make it too much work to refactor obviously incorrect things.
>>>
>>> As soon as we have rough consensus on this and the build robot
>>> are happy I will apply it to GPIO and also pull it into the pinctrl
>>> subsystem.
>>
>> For me priorities like this:
>> 1) it works after the patch being applied (no regressions);
>> 2) it makes code cleaner at the end;
>> 3) it is presented in logically split parts.
>>
>> So, as long as 1) and 2) are satisfied I can neglect on 3).
>
> We are in violent agreement :D

What I would like to say is that is up to you after all :-)
For me looks better to split.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko