linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: cpuidle: Disable preemption before get_lppaca function call in pseries_idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <a4a42aadef838e115db89590a2ebeb67@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:28:29 -0300
From:   Victor Aoqui <victora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, paulus@...ba.org,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ltc-interlock@...ts.linux.ibm.com, victora@...ibm.com,
        mauricfo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: cpuidle: Disable preemption before get_lppaca
 function call in pseries_idle_probe function

Em 2017-07-20 18:21, Benjamin Herrenschmidt escreveu:
> On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 14:57 -0300, Victor Aoqui wrote:
>> When CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, the following warning shows up:
>> 
>> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: 
>> swapper/0/1
>> caller is pseries_processor_idle_init+0x58/0x21c
>> 
>> This warning shows up because preemption cannot occur when using
>> get_paca(), otherwise the paca_struct it points to may be the wrong 
>> one
>> just after.
>> 
>> For this reason, preemption needs to be disabled before
>> lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca()).
> 
> Also chekc the generated assembly. We had all sort of interesting
> issues where gcc would copy the paca pointer or the lppaca pointer
> to a GPR *outside* of the preempt disabled section...
> 
> In that specific case it's not a big deal but overall, I am not
> comfortable with PREEMPT on powerpc until we do something a bit
> more drastic...
> 
> I would like to remove all such direct accesses to paca, instead have a
> "new" get_paca() written in asm that does the preempt disable then
> returns the PACA in a GPR (not directly use r13, hide that from gcc),
> and which is paired with a put_paca().
> 
> The few places where we want to directly access r13 should be hand
> written in asm too to hide r13 from gcc, for accessing the irq_happened
> in the fast path of local_irq_enable/disable/... we should do the same
> with lock tokens.
> 
> Ben.

Hi Benjamin,

Sorry for the delay. I was a little bit busy last days.
I took note of your comments and I will work on those changes.
I will let you know soon when it's done.

Thanks

-- 
Victor Aoqui