lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2017 13:58:04 +0000
From:   "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
CC:     Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Issue with commit de3ef1eb1cd - PM / core: Drop run_wake flag
 from struct dev_pm_info [Was: MEI-related WARN_ON() triggered during
 resume-from-sleep on v4.13-rc2+]

> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Usyskin, Alexander
> <alexander.usyskin@...el.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > We using pci_dev_run_wake that changed in mentioned patch to decide if
> > to replace usual PM callbacks with domain ones.
> > IIRC, the mei device is not remote wakeable on that platform, so we
> > should set domain callbacks.
> > There was a patch in PM framework that squashes runtime suspend with
> > usual suspend for some devices.
> > May it be that now pci_dev_run_wake returns true form mei and we are
> > not setting domain callbacks?
> > In that case we going through PCI device level PM path and may trigger
> that squash.
> > That will explain lack of mei logs on suspend.
> >
> > Dominik, can you try comment out "if (!pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))"
> > at drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c (around line 223) to set domain callbacks
> > by force to see if this is indeed the case?
> 
> Why exactly do you need the pci_dev_run_wake(pdev) check?

We need to re-review this code now, but as far as I remember.
On some platforms with NFC connected via MEI, there was no PME enabled,  hence we needed to keep in band irq opened for rx to wake us up.
 
Thanks
Tomas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ