linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Check if nested virtualization is in use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170801145844.GK5176@cbox>
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:58:44 +0200
From:   Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
To:     Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@...aro.org>
Cc:     kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mchehab@...nel.org, cov@...eaurora.org,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        david.daney@...ium.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        stefan@...lo-penguin.com, Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        wcohen@...hat.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        shankerd@...eaurora.org, vladimir.murzin@....com,
        james.morse@....com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KVM General <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Check if nested
 virtualization is in use

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:07:40AM -0400, Jintack Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:58:30AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> >> Nested virtualizaion is in use only if all three conditions are met:
> >> - The architecture supports nested virtualization.
> >> - The kernel parameter is set.
> >> - The userspace uses nested virtualiztion feature.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@...aro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h   | 11 +++++++++++
> >>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
> >>  arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c           | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                |  4 ++++
> >>  4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> index 00b0f97..7e9e6c8 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> @@ -303,4 +303,15 @@ static inline int __init kvmarm_nested_cfg(char *buf)
> >>  {
> >>       return 0;
> >>  }
> >> +
> >> +static inline int init_nested_virt(void)
> >> +{
> >> +     return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline bool nested_virt_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >> +{
> >> +     return false;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  #endif /* __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> index 6df0c7c..86d4b6c 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> @@ -387,5 +387,7 @@ static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void)
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  int __init kvmarm_nested_cfg(char *buf);
> >> +int init_nested_virt(void);
> >> +bool nested_virt_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >>
> >>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> >> index 79f38da..9a05c76 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> >> @@ -24,3 +24,20 @@ int __init kvmarm_nested_cfg(char *buf)
> >>  {
> >>       return strtobool(buf, &nested_param);
> >>  }
> >> +
> >> +int init_nested_virt(void)
> >> +{
> >> +     if (nested_param && cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT))
> >> +             kvm_info("Nested virtualization is supported\n");
> >> +
> >> +     return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +bool nested_virt_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >> +{
> >> +     if (nested_param && cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT)
> >> +         && test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_NESTED_VIRT, vcpu->arch.features))
> >> +             return true;
> >
> > you could initialize a bool in init_nested_virt which you then check
> > here to avoid duplicating the logic.
> 
> I can make a bool to check the kernel param and the capability. The
> third one is per VM given by the userspace, so we don't know it when
> we initialize the host hypervisor. We can potentially have a bool in
> kvm_vcpu_arch or kvm_arch to cache the whole three conditions, if that
> sounds ok.
> 

Yes, that sounds good to me.

Thanks,
-Christoffer