linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/16] ntb: ensure ntb_mw_get_align() is only called when the link is up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c4235dc9-90d0-1e68-7c73-c2a5bec83712@deltatee.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:17:47 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
Cc:     linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Allen Hubbe <Allen.Hubbe@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/16] ntb: ensure ntb_mw_get_align() is only called
 when the link is up

Hey,

On 01/08/17 12:14 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> This also looks like a bug fix.  However, given that it is a little more
> invasive and no one reporting any problems with it, I'm less apt to
> pull it into the bug-fixes branch without anyone compilaining of a
> bug (lest I break something in -stable).

Yes, 6 and 7 change a semantic of that function. I wouldn't call them
bug fixes. But you can't pull 7 without pulling 6, as 7 would break
everything unless the change in 6 occurs.

Thanks,

Logan