linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 10/15] exec: Use secureexec for setting dumpability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1501614998-62619-11-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Tue,  1 Aug 2017 12:16:33 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/15] exec: Use secureexec for setting dumpability

The examination of "current" to decide dumpability is wrong. This was a
check of and euid/uid (or egid/gid) mismatch in the existing process,
not the newly created one. This appears to stretch back into even the
"history.git" tree. Luckily, dumpability is later set in commit_creds().
In earlier kernel versions before creds existed, similar checks also
existed late in the exec flow, covering up the mistake as far back as I
could find.

Note that because the commit_creds() check examines differences of euid,
uid, egid, gid, and capabilities between the old and new creds, it would
look like the setup_new_exec() dumpability test could be entirely removed.
However, the secureexec test may cover a different set of tests (specific
to the LSMs) than what commit_creds() checks for. So, fix this test to
use secureexec (the removed euid tests are redundant to the commoncap
secureexec checks now).

Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
---
 fs/exec.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index eca0cb550a06..3536437ffd76 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)

 	current->sas_ss_sp = current->sas_ss_size = 0;

-	if (uid_eq(current_euid(), current_uid()) && gid_eq(current_egid(), current_gid()))
+	if (!bprm->secureexec)
 		set_dumpable(current->mm, SUID_DUMP_USER);
 	else
 		set_dumpable(current->mm, suid_dumpable);
-- 
2.7.4